I always said Cullen Hoback named Ron as Q not because he had any justifiable reason to believe that, but just for dramatic effect. Oh wait...no, that wasn't me, that was your friend:
"Arguably Cullen stanned for Ron the hardest with his documentary. But that's called dramatic effect, I think.
Or "I really need an ending for all this amazing footage
Stanned for "Ron is Q" not Ron personally, if that wasn't clear." ~ @heisyourproblem.
Hey Kit, that's why I said I'm open to the idea it's not him. I just asked to get more convincing proof which Jim claims he has in this very post, and in return I get a ban.
Cullen got that so spectacularly wrong, and yet somehow you all still defend the idea, even when acknowledge it might have just been said for "dramatic effect". lol
Remember Mike Flynn giving a speech about the "digital soldiers" to YAF on November 14, 2016. He was recruiting them, of course. Then he wasn't yet a Christian-crazy, or maybe he was, still did hide that then. https://twitter.com/maggie_pdx/status/967874037765455872 The link to that speech.
And Q was launched a 13 months later on an image board known for alt-right LARPs of all kinds, people who lived and breathed Trump, Bannon and the gang. The LARPer couldn't just copy year old phraseology of a well know persona in the alt-right?
What is your evidence for calling him a “satanic pedophile”? I think you maybe right about some things but saying this with no evidence is just like what Qanon does
Jim said, "Ronald Watkins is the son of Satanic pedophile Jim Watkins." Further a simple Google search revealed multiple links to articles about enabling child porn on his servers. Check for yourself.
He owned a number of websites with dubious account names like 00preteens . com , but on further investigation it was found out that there was never any illegal content on there. They were meant as clickbait links in order to get pedophiles in, which is objectively disgusting, but it doesn't make him a pedophile nor satanic. Lets not go into Qanon territory and call everybody we don't like satanic pedophiles, making it easier for actual pedophiles to go under the radar.
OMG great job on switching your question and indignation from pedophile to satanic. Life must be very sad for you to spend all day on Jim's substack in an attempt to instigate feigned distress and resentment. Good luck with that the law is watching you now! Tell Lt Flynn I said kick rocks, it'll be great practice for prison.
Can you say why you disagree with Badd on Q=Flynn vs GRU? https://twitter.com/BaddCompani/status/1485307364945190915?s=20
Badd does no research at all - not a good reference.
Did anyone notice how many Jim’s are involved in Q. I say we remove some Jims… which Jim first? Any Jims want to raise their hands.
Maybe the ones spreading false information…
Good idea! Wait... aren't they already banned and under investigation?
https://techcrunch.com/2021/01/08/twitter-qanon-sidney-powell-michael-flynn-ron-watkins/
I always said Cullen Hoback named Ron as Q not because he had any justifiable reason to believe that, but just for dramatic effect. Oh wait...no, that wasn't me, that was your friend:
"Arguably Cullen stanned for Ron the hardest with his documentary. But that's called dramatic effect, I think.
Or "I really need an ending for all this amazing footage
Stanned for "Ron is Q" not Ron personally, if that wasn't clear." ~ @heisyourproblem.
Hey Kit, that's why I said I'm open to the idea it's not him. I just asked to get more convincing proof which Jim claims he has in this very post, and in return I get a ban.
Good. I'm glad he did. Anything else I can do for you?
Yeah, maybe just try to have normal discussion instead of simping so hard for Jim.
Cullen got that so spectacularly wrong, and yet somehow you all still defend the idea, even when acknowledge it might have just been said for "dramatic effect". lol
Troll @KassandraSeven
Thanks Jim.
Remember Mike Flynn giving a speech about the "digital soldiers" to YAF on November 14, 2016. He was recruiting them, of course. Then he wasn't yet a Christian-crazy, or maybe he was, still did hide that then. https://twitter.com/maggie_pdx/status/967874037765455872 The link to that speech.
And Q was launched a 13 months later on an image board known for alt-right LARPs of all kinds, people who lived and breathed Trump, Bannon and the gang. The LARPer couldn't just copy year old phraseology of a well know persona in the alt-right?
What is your evidence for calling him a “satanic pedophile”? I think you maybe right about some things but saying this with no evidence is just like what Qanon does
Jim said, "Ronald Watkins is the son of Satanic pedophile Jim Watkins." Further a simple Google search revealed multiple links to articles about enabling child porn on his servers. Check for yourself.
He owned a number of websites with dubious account names like 00preteens . com , but on further investigation it was found out that there was never any illegal content on there. They were meant as clickbait links in order to get pedophiles in, which is objectively disgusting, but it doesn't make him a pedophile nor satanic. Lets not go into Qanon territory and call everybody we don't like satanic pedophiles, making it easier for actual pedophiles to go under the radar.
Troll @KassandraSeven
Nope not Kassandra, but I see that it's hard around here to be nuanced and factual, you even get banned for it.
lol
bahaha this dumb line is so tired.
The straw man they keep bashing should have bruises by now. lol
OMG great job on switching your question and indignation from pedophile to satanic. Life must be very sad for you to spend all day on Jim's substack in an attempt to instigate feigned distress and resentment. Good luck with that the law is watching you now! Tell Lt Flynn I said kick rocks, it'll be great practice for prison.
I'm willing to give that theory a shot. This is some evil shit, whatever spectral or spiritual box you wanna label it under.