What about Flynn's snake flag there? Why isn't that Satanic serpent symbology, ffs? You damn well if the left adopted that symbol, that is what they would say. No, demons do NOT exist in any concrete way. Nobody is literally demon possessed. That's just a way of dehumanizing ones political opponents. It's exactly the kind of mental manipulation they are projecting on us.
"In July 2019, Harari was widely criticised for allowing several omissions and amendments in the Russian edition of his third book 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, using a softer tone when speaking about Russian authorities.[54][55] Leonid Bershidsky in Moscow Times called it "caution — or, to call it by its proper name, cowardice",[56] and Nettanel Slyomovics in Haaretz claimed that "he is sacrificing those same liberal ideas that he presumes to represent".[57] In a response, Harari stated that he "was warned that due to these few examples Russian censorship will not allow distribution of a Russian translation of the book" and that he "therefore faced a dilemma," namely to "replace these few examples with other examples, and publish the book in Russia," or "change nothing, and publish nothing," and that he "preferred publishing, because Russia is a leading global power and it seemed important that the book’s ideas should reach readers in Russia, especially as the book is still very critical of the Putin regime – just without naming names."
Does Flynn have his very own Agenda 21 target list now?
What about Flynn's snake flag there? Why isn't that Satanic serpent symbology, ffs? You damn well if the left adopted that symbol, that is what they would say. No, demons do NOT exist in any concrete way. Nobody is literally demon possessed. That's just a way of dehumanizing ones political opponents. It's exactly the kind of mental manipulation they are projecting on us.
"In July 2019, Harari was widely criticised for allowing several omissions and amendments in the Russian edition of his third book 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, using a softer tone when speaking about Russian authorities.[54][55] Leonid Bershidsky in Moscow Times called it "caution — or, to call it by its proper name, cowardice",[56] and Nettanel Slyomovics in Haaretz claimed that "he is sacrificing those same liberal ideas that he presumes to represent".[57] In a response, Harari stated that he "was warned that due to these few examples Russian censorship will not allow distribution of a Russian translation of the book" and that he "therefore faced a dilemma," namely to "replace these few examples with other examples, and publish the book in Russia," or "change nothing, and publish nothing," and that he "preferred publishing, because Russia is a leading global power and it seemed important that the book’s ideas should reach readers in Russia, especially as the book is still very critical of the Putin regime – just without naming names."
Does Flynn have his very own Agenda 21 target list now?
"Gradually I watched it come out over time."