Nicole is pathetic. I remember years ago when my kids you young, there was always that deeply insecure mom who acted ridiculous. None of us said “we’re socialists” -- this was the late 90s, no one did. We lived in a densely populated hipster area, so if any place would have been DSA/socialist-aligned that would have been the place. It is now.
And also LMAO at Nicole’s pal, “Berniecrat” Brandee of SF. Brandee owns *an entire house* in DOWNTOWN SF. So lol at these “progressive activists who hate upper middle class ppl that work in tech” 🙄
Nicole, if you’re reading this: I promise, you’ll look back at your obnoxious behavior and you’ll be embarrassed.
So much tortious interference. On May 31, 1998, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) for allegedly obstructing interstate trade, claiming that the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) had created an unfair competition process by promoting "an unsanitary and inconsistent position" for its products. A majority of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals took issue with that complaint on two ground: (1) there was such a process, and (2) the United States Government could not establish who had created it. The NAM decided to respond to the case by filing an appeal, affirming a preliminary hearing on October 19, 1998. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in that case reversed on another grounds, and on June 8, 1999, Judge Richard Posner held that the Federal Trade Commission had failed to prove cause at this point on every claim it raised at trial: "FTC claims on non-felony claims do not fall within the narrow exception of First Amendment claims." (2) Judge Posner took the Fifth Circuit's holding even further. He explained that § 591.6 is a regulation that could not be waived or diminished through a process of trial, including the hearing of claims against the United States, that was not mandated by the statute of limitations for those claims (Section 591.4(b)), and therefore did not include this subsection (Section 591.6(d) and the petition of denied approved claims.
💙 You are Welcome my friend. Matt Donovan is the troll Jim is referring to. I tried to communicate in a respectful manner with Matt Donovan on both Substack and Twitter. Matt is not to be trusted and it isn't worth the attempt to approach Matt on a even level of conversation. Don't bother. Matt Donovan infiltrated The Thinkin Project and destroyed Jim's effort to help those who had been brainwashed by Michael Flynn's QAnon psyop. Matt, Nicole, mike rothschild and desiree made certain that Jim's efforts would not come to fruition. I told you all that Jim will never give up, and he won't. Love you Jim :) ❤️
Jim, give, s.margana@aol.com, a try. *
Much love and respect for you and our tribe. I’m right here with you. Need anything just ask. 😘
Nicole is pathetic. I remember years ago when my kids you young, there was always that deeply insecure mom who acted ridiculous. None of us said “we’re socialists” -- this was the late 90s, no one did. We lived in a densely populated hipster area, so if any place would have been DSA/socialist-aligned that would have been the place. It is now.
And also LMAO at Nicole’s pal, “Berniecrat” Brandee of SF. Brandee owns *an entire house* in DOWNTOWN SF. So lol at these “progressive activists who hate upper middle class ppl that work in tech” 🙄
Nicole, if you’re reading this: I promise, you’ll look back at your obnoxious behavior and you’ll be embarrassed.
So much tortious interference. On May 31, 1998, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) for allegedly obstructing interstate trade, claiming that the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) had created an unfair competition process by promoting "an unsanitary and inconsistent position" for its products. A majority of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals took issue with that complaint on two ground: (1) there was such a process, and (2) the United States Government could not establish who had created it. The NAM decided to respond to the case by filing an appeal, affirming a preliminary hearing on October 19, 1998. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in that case reversed on another grounds, and on June 8, 1999, Judge Richard Posner held that the Federal Trade Commission had failed to prove cause at this point on every claim it raised at trial: "FTC claims on non-felony claims do not fall within the narrow exception of First Amendment claims." (2) Judge Posner took the Fifth Circuit's holding even further. He explained that § 591.6 is a regulation that could not be waived or diminished through a process of trial, including the hearing of claims against the United States, that was not mandated by the statute of limitations for those claims (Section 591.4(b)), and therefore did not include this subsection (Section 591.6(d) and the petition of denied approved claims.
💙 You are Welcome my friend. Matt Donovan is the troll Jim is referring to. I tried to communicate in a respectful manner with Matt Donovan on both Substack and Twitter. Matt is not to be trusted and it isn't worth the attempt to approach Matt on a even level of conversation. Don't bother. Matt Donovan infiltrated The Thinkin Project and destroyed Jim's effort to help those who had been brainwashed by Michael Flynn's QAnon psyop. Matt, Nicole, mike rothschild and desiree made certain that Jim's efforts would not come to fruition. I told you all that Jim will never give up, and he won't. Love you Jim :) ❤️