18 Comments
User's avatar
Allan Crow's avatar

The DNC and the corporate Democrats are an unfortunate excuse for a political opposition. I share your views and believe J6 was the unprosecuted crime of the century. I can't believe how anemically Garland dithered. It was sedition; there is no other legal description for what happened. Hope I can make the chat tomorrow.

Expand full comment
Ray's avatar

Another weekend goes by and he leads us to another level to hell yet again.

Expand full comment
Allan Crow's avatar

The road to hell.

Expand full comment
Mark Archambault's avatar

The deranged madman just dropped bunker busters on the Iran nuclear sites. What's next?

Expand full comment
Phil M.'s avatar

All those who thought he would obey them are finding out he is a "backstabbing crook." You made my day with that, Jim. But you also opened my eyes to WTH he is doing with all these dramas going on all at once. He is wearing us down, forcing us to doomscroll, with all his "Reality TV" star style dramas turned into reality. Nobody can decide which one to pursue, where or when to start.

But I think we need to focus on what he is not allowing us to focus on. His DOGe boys robbing all of our data. Even if he got kicked out of office today, we will still pay. If all his executive odors were nullified, we would still pay. His doge boys are following in the footsteps of their role model, Snowden.

I know you don't talk about him much, not because you don't know, because both liberals and conservatives are completely brainwashed into believing he is some sort of hero. If not for him, there would be no Russian collusion in our elections. No Q, no Trump, and even the huge division between the left and right would be more realistic. He never stopped doing his job when he absconded to Moscow with all those laptops full of our data from the NSA.

Expand full comment
GW B's avatar

There is nothing rebellious in enforcing our existing constitution and separation of powers as we designed them. It is constitutional conservatism at its best to continue to strategize the best route to reigning in this off-the-rails anti-constitutional scofflaw administration. Revolution feels like the wrong word for containing, and holding accountable criminal actors. What to call what we need to do, is a great question. So far, most efforts have been towards highlighting and documenting these crimes for currently stopping illegal acts and preparing future prosecutions. The damage done by these vandals in the meantime has been significant. Are there alternatives to the word Revolution that better fit? Will think on this.

Expand full comment
Mary-BethSMontgomery's avatar

So I see it as we are already at war with Russia who installed these clowns. They are trying to dismantle our democracy and country from within. Is that a coup?

Expand full comment
GW B's avatar

Russia has been at war with us for a long time. If only Congress could declare that war from our side we would have ao much latitude to handle traitors appropriately, Alas, the house an md senate are not facitabkw. Wishing last administration could have taken this step when they had the majority. Fingers crossed we can do this soon.

Expand full comment
Phil M.'s avatar

I agree. The Democrats have turned into a bunch of panhandlers begging for donations, to their re-election campaign. They are not motivated to end any dramas. They are busy capitalizing on them. So who can we get to actually prosecute these criminals? Mueller and agent Smith didn't get the backup they needed.

Expand full comment
Suzanne White's avatar

A former neighbor, who is in her eighties and quite religious, texted me that she heard (on Alexa) that trump had pardoned known criminals. She then vehemently turned against trump! BUT, then her son (living with her in his 60s) told her that that was fake news. She texted me back to tell me her son had ‘checked it out’ and it was just ‘fake news’.

What is it about many men that makes them see trump’s control as existential for male

value in our country?

Expand full comment
Phil M.'s avatar

It's biblical. All religions are patriarchal. No religion has ever written in their holey books that Women are equal. According to god you are supposed to just stfu an make sammiches. Harsh, but you know it's true. It is written! No offense intended.

Expand full comment
Blue Moon Pie's avatar

Now is the time for the pro-Democracy movement to attack JD Vance’s image. Don’t assume he can’t become very popular. He has the advantage of being a straight, white male Christian from the heartland. His weaknesses and vulnerabilities must be publicized loudly and often. PR offense sooner rather than later would seem to be the best approach.

Expand full comment
GW B's avatar

As a Thiel sub brotoge anti-Christian and self-confessed couch humper that just can’t bring himself to step out on the town without his trademark eyeliner, it never would have crossed my mind in a million years to classify JD Vance as a straight white Christian male. If there is a perception out there now that he is, despite several dressings down from the actual pope, it is certainly time to get as much info out as possible about the true nature of JD. This repressed nameshifting constantly reinventing himself pogue is not presidential material, and neither is his sugar daddy.

Expand full comment
Claire Read, PhD's avatar

Jim, you are absolutely correct. It needs to be done now because once Thiel takes over we are in even deeper shit—like being in quicksand. We need a CentCom. Being scattered uprisings won’t do it. Do we have one? Can we get one? Thanks for the horrible list. One or two at a time is bad enough. Altogether it’s mind blowing. These idiots, apart from being Nazis, commies and greedy bastards, are all bullies. Do bullies understand other bullies? They expected Trump to be grateful and to follow the playbook. Being the kind of quite stupid, street smart bully he is, they should have known he wouldn’t. So what now?

Expand full comment
Phil M.'s avatar

Had to google CentCom. Maybe we can depend on the military to step in before it's too late. Their lackluster show at the Army's birthday, that Trump co-opted into his own little show, was a pity party for him. But possibly a silent protest against him????

Ask your self this one question.

If, on January 6th, Trump thought he had the support of the military for his little insurrection? Would he not have called them to march on the capital for support?

Expand full comment
Jo Kurtz's avatar

Heard about a mail carrier in Seattle who was questioned by unsavory characters about the address of a person they were looking for. She referred them to the post office and did not answer them. This is unacceptable.

Expand full comment
Claire Read, PhD's avatar

And of course Jump Dump, once in the WH, will do exactly what he is told to do. Puppet president.

Expand full comment
Gari Gold Richardson's avatar

Ready. ⚡️

Expand full comment