One of the key attributes to Yonder has been control of narratives on social media. These organizations also have reliable media assets that they can get disinformation pushed out to. That part of tge interconnected operations hasn’t been broken
Yonder reminds me of the social media of social interaction. We're all interconnected in nature. When things become public, people begin to understand the dynamics of this whole ecosystem of connections by looking at the interactions that we make and what relationships we may have. And what that comes up with is, what's going on here, who does it? Who is it that needs to be addressed and what should be addressed? It becomes really important.
There's no denying the impact of this information. It affects everyone. In the context of our online existence, it is a very powerful thing. We're all connected. To say, "I see you," that's an extreme example of what an information-centric community will look like.
GAMERGATE.
The one thing that never happens to the whole of GAMERGATE is their obsession with being "cool" or "cool" that they're not, and then having them hate everybody that isn't, is really embarrassing since every time they make this ridiculous attempt to make all of them look at the internet in a completely ignorant, negative way and make that people not look at that site in a negative way, they make them look like they aren't so important or valuable to your game. I personally have one guy that's doing just such a poor job of making his point against me because everyone, regardless of which gamer, he's trying to paint as "fun" for these people, even though he probably hates GAMERGATE himself, but how do women, especially women of any background (and certainly women of any ethnicity), get that it's ALL "fun"? That's too bad... I don't want to see anything that looks like my job. It also means that I am literally not allowed to talk to my fellow gamers or have any direct interaction with them (even though there are at least two women on the staff who would say so), which I'm told is pretty much against GAMERGATE "norm". The one thing that, in the eyes of GAMERGATE: is it OK to whine about how their work is ruining all of this because you'll never see a day without GAMERGATE going on about how?
I understand this, for the most part. When I read a Wired article about Fredrick and his little whiney, lame -ass posse, I was a little bit, "They'll grow out of it" and a lot, "What a bunch of insecure little assholes". They didn't grow out of it and they are now much bigger and much more than assholes. Girls/women included. Fuck you all. I like you Nick Shitty.
Note that Zaid has Oliver Stone’s (debunked) JFK book/movie on his shelf.
That movie is popular in Q circles, but is heavily criticised by historians and academics.
It’s such a stinker, it’s not something any serious legal professional would promote.
Just one big happy Kremlin crime family.
Why would Lawrence have him on??? JFC
lol he did it again
Information control.
One of the key attributes to Yonder has been control of narratives on social media. These organizations also have reliable media assets that they can get disinformation pushed out to. That part of tge interconnected operations hasn’t been broken
Yonder reminds me of the social media of social interaction. We're all interconnected in nature. When things become public, people begin to understand the dynamics of this whole ecosystem of connections by looking at the interactions that we make and what relationships we may have. And what that comes up with is, what's going on here, who does it? Who is it that needs to be addressed and what should be addressed? It becomes really important.
There's no denying the impact of this information. It affects everyone. In the context of our online existence, it is a very powerful thing. We're all connected. To say, "I see you," that's an extreme example of what an information-centric community will look like.
GAMERGATE.
The one thing that never happens to the whole of GAMERGATE is their obsession with being "cool" or "cool" that they're not, and then having them hate everybody that isn't, is really embarrassing since every time they make this ridiculous attempt to make all of them look at the internet in a completely ignorant, negative way and make that people not look at that site in a negative way, they make them look like they aren't so important or valuable to your game. I personally have one guy that's doing just such a poor job of making his point against me because everyone, regardless of which gamer, he's trying to paint as "fun" for these people, even though he probably hates GAMERGATE himself, but how do women, especially women of any background (and certainly women of any ethnicity), get that it's ALL "fun"? That's too bad... I don't want to see anything that looks like my job. It also means that I am literally not allowed to talk to my fellow gamers or have any direct interaction with them (even though there are at least two women on the staff who would say so), which I'm told is pretty much against GAMERGATE "norm". The one thing that, in the eyes of GAMERGATE: is it OK to whine about how their work is ruining all of this because you'll never see a day without GAMERGATE going on about how?
I understand this, for the most part. When I read a Wired article about Fredrick and his little whiney, lame -ass posse, I was a little bit, "They'll grow out of it" and a lot, "What a bunch of insecure little assholes". They didn't grow out of it and they are now much bigger and much more than assholes. Girls/women included. Fuck you all. I like you Nick Shitty.
Say What, Jim? 😳
I will reread. TY