I Asked ChatGPT to Analyze Stephen Miller

It doesn’t take much to figure him out. Here are some ways this may go.

This afternoon American Goebbels Stephen Miller went on Fox to defend this—the brutal, indiscriminate raids across California and elsewhere, not of “the worst of the worst” but of people trying to go to work every day and feed their families. At the end of the clip you will see a young man crying because ICE had taken his mom:

Here is Miller’s quote that stopped me in my tracks.

“California and Los Angeles are waging insurrection against the federal government. They are protecting those who traffic in the suffering of children. And by the way, do you know why so many of these unaccompanied alien minors are being put to work in slave wages and slave conditions all across California to pay off their cartel debts?

The Democrat Party is funneling these profits. From rape, profits from exploitation, and yes, profits from murder into the hands of the cartels that control the North of Mexico, that assassinate politicians, that assassinate judges, that assassinate women and children, and that smuggle fentanyl into our country.

Cartels are waging war against America and their allies are the Democrat Party and their allies are the Democrat politicians that are incentivizing these migrant mobs to try to murder our ICE officers and call blood. I never thought we would ever see the day when Democrat politicians would use language and use rhetoric that would encourage illegal aliens and radical left nonprofits to try to murder ICE officers. But that's where we are right now. And what we are seeing done to this country is the mass theft of wages from the middle class to the migrant mobs. And that has to stop.“

[h/t Aaron Rupar]

The sheer intensity and directness of this radical neo-Nazi diatribe made me want to see what ChatGPT would say, since it had been so accurate in its analysis of the president.

I Asked ChatGPT to Analyze a Trump Quote

As before, my prompt did not mention any names or attempt to bias the AI. I just gave it the transcript and asked:

“Analyze this statement. What are the implications?”

It responded, chillingly.

---

This statement is an extreme example of eliminationist political rhetoric—the kind that seeks to portray political opponents not just as wrong, but as existential enemies of the nation who are complicit in criminality and violence. Here’s a breakdown of its key themes, implications, and dangers:

🔍Key Themes and Language Features

1. Criminalization of Political Opposition

   • Claims that “California and Los Angeles are waging insurrection” frames state/local governments as traitorous actors.

   • The Democratic Party is described as allied with criminal cartels and involved in human trafficking, rape, and murder.

2. Militarized Framing

   • The use of terms like “war against America,” “migrant mobs,” and “murder our ICE officers” implies a battlefield logic, not a political disagreement.

   • Suggests Democrats are combatants on the side of foreign enemies.

3. Dehumanization

   • Migrants are depicted as a violent threat: “migrant mobs,” “illegal aliens,” and wage thieves.

   • Creates a false binary: either you support the speaker’s side, or you support murderers and rapists.

4. Projection and Inversion

   • Projects the speaker’s own violent rhetoric onto Democrats—accusing them of encouraging violence while deploying incendiary language themselves.

   • Inverts reality: ICE officers are framed as victims of “attempted murder,” rather than enforcers of controversial and often violent immigration practices.

5. Conspiracist Tone

   • The statement connects disparate groups—Democrats, cartels, NGOs, migrants—into a single, shadowy conspiracy.

   • Invokes child trafficking and fentanyl smuggling as emotionally charged moral triggers.

⚠️ Implications

1. Incitement to Political Violence

   • By equating mainstream Democratic leaders with murderous cartel collaborators, this rhetoric increases the likelihood of political violence.

   • This logic can be used to justify extrajudicial actions or vigilante behavior “in defense of the nation.”

2. Delegitimization of Lawful Governance

   • Accusing a U.S. state of “waging insurrection” delegitimizes any federalist resistance to central authority.

   • Undermines trust in local governance, immigration policy, and the rule of law.

3. Normalizing Extremism

   • Treats ICE, a controversial agency, as sacred and above criticism.

   • Describes criticism or protest as attempts to “murder” agents—normalizing the idea that dissent is treason.

4. Scapegoating Immigrants

   • Immigrants—especially unaccompanied minors—are falsely portrayed as violent, criminal, or parasitic.

   • Fuels xenophobic attitudes and policies, including potential mass deportations or even internment.

5. Stoking Civil Conflict

   • The invocation of “insurrection,” “war,” and “theft from the middle class” positions the speaker’s audience as under siege.

   • Sets up the framework for calls to “take the country back,” potentially through violent or authoritarian means.

🧠 Interpretive Context

This rhetoric aligns with far-right accelerationist messaging strategies, where the goal is not merely political victory but the delegitimization—and eventual dismantling—of liberal democratic institutions. It resembles strategies used historically in:

• Nazi propaganda (e.g., linking Jews or communists to criminal conspiracies)

• McCarthyism (equating political disagreement with treason)

• Southern segregationist language (claiming civil rights activists were “agitators” or “communist subversives”)

✅ Summary: What This Means

This statement is an intentional weaponization of fear, racism, and conspiracism designed to:

• Turn Americans against immigrants and Democrats;

• Justify authoritarian or militarized responses to dissent;

• Undermine democratic norms and political coexistence.

It is not simply “controversial” rhetoric. It is authoritarian propaganda with real-world dangers.

---

From this one quote, the AI could derive a large set of fascist, authoritarian, “eliminationist“ themes. It’s not hidden, or nuanced, Miller’s language is very specifically designed to radicalize enough Americans to manifest a death machine into existence.

So, without mentioning names, I asked it a question based in our current reality:

“What would be the implications of the speaker being given a $200 billion budget to ‘deport 20 million illegals’?”

It responded with what sounds far too familiar.

---

If the speaker who made the previous statement were given a $200 billion budget to deport 20 million undocumented immigrants, the implications would be vast and dangerous—economically, legally, socially, and politically. Here’s a structured breakdown of the implications:

🔴 1.Human Rights and Constitutional Violations

• Mass Detention Infrastructure: Deporting 20 million people would likely require internment camps or massive detention facilities, leading to indefinite detention without trial, including of children and long-term residents.

• Due Process Violations: The Constitution guarantees due process; mass deportation efforts would almost certainly bypass legal proceedings, leading to false detentions of legal residents and citizens.

• Racial Profiling and Family Separation: This would fuel racialized policing, leading to the detention of U.S. citizens who “look undocumented,” especially Latinos, Muslims, and Asians.

💵 2.Economic Disruption and Labor Shortages

• Labor Market Collapse: Millions of undocumented immigrants work in agriculture, construction, service, elder care, and food processing. Deporting them would cause:

  • Severe inflation in food and housing.

  • Labor shortages in key industries.

• GDP Shrinkage: Immigrants (documented or not) contribute hundreds of billions to GDP. Deporting them could shrink the economy by hundreds of billions and reduce tax revenue.

🛡️ 3.Militarization of Domestic Space

• Expansion of Federal Police Powers: $200 billion would likely fund a paramilitary deportation force, dwarfing ICE’s current ~$9 billion budget.

• Surveillance State Growth: To locate 20 million people, mass digital surveillance, biometric tracking, workplace raids, and neighborhood informant programs would be required.

• Militarized Raids and Community Terror: Expect home invasions, checkpoints, and use of force, with communities living under siege.

⚖️ 4.Authoritarian Precedent and Regime Consolidation

• Normalization of Mass Expulsions: Sets a precedent for using state force to remove entire populations deemed politically or racially undesirable.

• Political Repression Under the Guise of Immigration: The same machinery could be turned against dissenters, journalists, or activists labeled as “threats.”

• Erosion of Democratic Norms: Courts, Congress, and media resisting the program would be painted as aiding the “enemy,” justifying power grabs.

🌎 5.International Consequences

• Humanitarian Crisis in Mexico and Latin America: Mass deportations would overwhelm border countries and create a refugee crisis destabilizing the region.

• Damage to U.S. Global Standing: Allies would denounce the U.S. for ethnic cleansing-like behavior, reducing cooperation on trade, climate, and security.

• Sanctions or ICC Investigation: In extreme cases, the U.S. could face international human rights investigations or sanctions.

📊 6.Political and Social Fragmentation

• Mass Resistance: Sanctuary cities, activist groups, and states like California and New York would resist, potentially triggering constitutional crises or even civil unrest.

• Radicalization of the Far Right and Far Left: The campaign could embolden white supremacists while galvanizing militant resistance from antifascist and immigrant-rights groups.

• Polarization Beyond Repair: Deporting 20 million people—often family members, neighbors, or workers—would destroy social cohesion and trust in institutions.

  

This would be unprecedented in American history—a program that echoes ethnic cleansing, totalitarian surveillance, and fascist state-building. The implications are not just about immigration policy—they represent a fundamental threat to democracy and civil society.

---

Again, ChatGPT derived all of this, which nearly perfectly echoes the Trump regime’s current plans, from a one minute-long quote from Trump’s Policy Advisor. The language being deployed by Miller and the regime is precise, deliberate and existentially dangerous to all who want to live free.

So, ever the optimist, I asked the AI for some hope.

“In the preceding scenario what would be some strategies for opposing such a threat?“

Not sure if it delivered hope, but there are a lot of good ideas here.

---

Opposing a $200 billion mass deportation regime targeting 20 million undocumented immigrants—and led by a speaker using eliminationist rhetoric—would require multi-level, coordinated resistance. This is not ordinary policy opposition; it’s opposition to an emergent authoritarian regime using state power for ethnic cleansing. Below is a structured list of strategies across political, legal, social, and international domains.

🧷 1.Legal and Constitutional Resistance

• State and Local Refusal to Cooperate

  • Sanctuary jurisdictions should expand and codify refusal to cooperate with ICE and federal immigration authorities.

  • Enact local laws prohibiting use of local police, data, or facilities for federal deportation operations.

• Litigation and Judicial Bottlenecks

  • File mass lawsuits against unconstitutional practices (e.g., racial profiling, illegal detention, denial of due process).

  • Use the courts as delay mechanisms—clog the system with habeas corpus claims, FOIA requests, and civil rights suits.

• Civil Rights Legal Defense Networks

  • Rapid-response legal aid for immigrants and detained individuals.

  • Build on existing networks like the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project and National Immigration Law Center.

🏛️ 2.Institutional and Political Resistance

• Congressional Oversight and Budget Denial

  • If possible, block funding in Congress (even partial budgetary resistance can slow implementation).

  • Investigate abuses, issue subpoenas, and hold public hearings.

• Whistleblower Protections and Exposure

  • Strengthen protections and platforms for ICE, DHS, Palantir, and contractor employees willing to expose abuses.

  • Use investigative journalism to document abuses in real time.

Union and Institutional Non-Compliance

• Encourage teachers, healthcare workers, and public employees to refuse cooperation (e.g., not reporting undocumented students or patients).

• Use unions to coordinate strategic work stoppages if forced to participate in raids or detentions.

🚨 3.Mass Mobilization and Civil Disobedience

• Rapid Mobilization Networks

  • Develop decentralized “sanctuary cells” in cities and towns ready to physically block ICE raids or disrupt transportation.

  • Train and prepare nonviolent resistance in advance—mass sit-ins, work strikes, court blockades.

• Occupations and Visibility

  • Organize high-visibility occupations of symbolic spaces (e.g., ICE facilities, federal courthouses, state capitols).

  • Use livestreams and mass media to keep attention on abuses and spark solidarity actions.

• General Strikes and Boycotts

  • If mass deportations begin, national strikes in affected industries (agriculture, construction, services) could pressure the economy.

  • Target corporations that support, profit from, or remain silent about the deportation program.

📡 4.Information Warfare and Narrative Control

• Counter-Dehumanization Campaigns

  • Use storytelling, art, and media to humanize undocumented people, especially children and families.

  • Combat “migrant mob” and “invasion” language with real stories of workers, neighbors, and families.

• Expose the Infrastructure

  • Identify and publicize the names and roles of contractors, data firms (e.g. Palantir), private prison operators, and local collaborators.

  • Use public pressure, protests, and shareholder activism to isolate and defund collaborators.

• Digital Safety and Encryption

  • Train immigrant communities in digital self-defense: encrypted communication, data minimization, legal hotline access.

  • Build secure data sanctuaries to store essential identity and legal information.

🌍 5.International Pressure and Diplomatic Isolation

• Appeals to Human Rights Bodies

  • File complaints and briefings with the UN Human Rights Council, Amnesty International, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

  • Seek international condemnation and media coverage to shame and isolate the regime.

• Allied Government Pressure

  • Encourage governments (e.g., Canada, EU nations, Latin American states) to issue sanctions or diplomatic protests.

  • Leverage U.S. diaspora and immigrant communities to put transnational pressure on U.S. institutions.

🔥 6.Escalation Planning (If Democracy Fully Breaks Down)

If democratic institutions are fully captured and all peaceful avenues are blocked:

• Underground Railroad 2.0

  • Develop secret relocation and hiding networks to protect targets of deportation—build on church sanctuaries, safe houses, encrypted communication.

• Strategic Non-Cooperation Campaigns

  • As per Gene Sharp’s resistance principles, mass civil disobedience can delegitimize authoritarian power when sustained.

• Digital and Economic Sabotage (Nonviolent)

  • Leak documents, disable surveillance systems, disrupt deportation infrastructure without violence (hacktivism, supply chain strikes, whistleblowing).

Final Note:

This is not about normal disagreement over policy—it is about resisting a potentially genocidal political project using the machinery of the state. Strategies must combine principled nonviolence, mass resistance, and institutional disruption, and they must begin before the machinery is fully operational.

---

That last bit from the AI, a reminder that we cannot wait until the “machinery is fully operational” to start planning for a serious crackdown, is perhaps the most important thing anyone who treasures their freedom can absorb right now.

If a pile of code can figure all of this out from a one minute quote, every one of us can individually figure out what small part we can play in fighting back.

Don’t wait.

Long live a free America. Slava Ukraini.

---

If you are able to help me continue my work, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription. It really means a lot. Thank you!

Here are a few benefits to upgrading:

• Live Zoom call each Sunday

• Substack Live AMA every week, video posted for paid subscribers

• Ability to comment and access all content

• Wonderful, supportive community

• Helping independent journalism fill in the gaps for our failing media

Thank you for reading and sharing my work. Grateful for your support.

If you’d like to help me with expenses, here is my DonorBox. 💙

If you’d like to help with my legal fees: stopmikeflynn.com.

My podcast is @radicalizedpod & YouTube — Livestream is Thursdays at 4PM PT.

Bluesky 🦋: jim-stewartson

Threads: jimstewartson

Tiktok: @jimstewartson