19 Comments

Recently on “The Five 8” LB and Greg discussed EO13848 and they didn’t realise it was written intentionally with a coup in mind, they just thought it was a regular boilerplate document that nearly got exploited.

Thanks for clearing this up, it was obviously written with malicious intent.

Out of all the liberal/legal commentators I listen to, Alison Gill is the only one who understands EO13848 like you guys.

Expand full comment

Damn. I missed this plus the chat for subscribers on Thursday. I think living in PA and the time difference is a reason why.

Expand full comment

Damn, it’s really frustrating when it doesn’t work!!! You might need to make the video start a bit later, when Gal answers the question about whether it was intentional or not-- or when you fix the issue at minute 12 or something. I’m sorry -I was just too tired--, I’m watching now, I was told it’s good stuff.

Expand full comment

Queen & David Bowie - Under Pressure (Classic Queen Mix)

319,556,824 views Mar 19, 2013

That's a lot of people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYYRH4apXDo

Expand full comment

Sorry I do not do Youtube chitchat so I asked here.

Expand full comment

That "environmental lawyer" would have gotten us out of Paris Agreement.

"The U.S. government deposited the notification with the Secretary General of the United Nations and officially withdrew one year later on 4 November 2020."

Expand full comment
Jul 31, 2022·edited Jul 31, 2022

Why wasn't the National Security Advisor – O'Brien – on duty that day? (Reference to him being out of town in Florida which he could have gotten back quickly.) Why were the duties left to deputy? National Security Advisor should have still been in command no matter where he was.

Expand full comment

Why does Joshua Steinman say that he wrote EO 13848?

Expand full comment

Me & the dogs will be watching

Expand full comment
founding

That's 11 here!! I'll go nap listening to Shania Twain

Expand full comment

Fantastic. 🕊

Expand full comment