Recently on “The Five 8” LB and Greg discussed EO13848 and they didn’t realise it was written intentionally with a coup in mind, they just thought it was a regular boilerplate document that nearly got exploited.
Thanks for clearing this up, it was obviously written with malicious intent.
Out of all the liberal/legal commentators I listen to, Alison Gill is the only one who understands EO13848 like you guys.
Damn, it’s really frustrating when it doesn’t work!!! You might need to make the video start a bit later, when Gal answers the question about whether it was intentional or not-- or when you fix the issue at minute 12 or something. I’m sorry -I was just too tired--, I’m watching now, I was told it’s good stuff.
Billy Idol - Eyes Without A Face (Official Music Video) Eyes Without A Face (Official Music Video) over 200 million views since 2009. That's a good one too.
Ann Vandersteel could have easily been a player in “I will tell you some secrets for no other reason than to jade my family. I am of the bloodlines.” (6/24/16)
That "environmental lawyer" would have gotten us out of Paris Agreement.
"The U.S. government deposited the notification with the Secretary General of the United Nations and officially withdrew one year later on 4 November 2020."
They knew they lost. That is why DOJ Clark - the "environmental lawyer" – would have been quite important at that time and through January 6. The mob serves as the second threat, a foreign threat – to any country – which was most – signed onto the Paris Agreement. So the mob was also a message to other foreign leaders (as was USAID). The activated mob was both a foreign and domestic terrorism threat. Same with the mobs in cyberspace.
Why wasn't the National Security Advisor – O'Brien – on duty that day? (Reference to him being out of town in Florida which he could have gotten back quickly.) Why were the duties left to deputy? National Security Advisor should have still been in command no matter where he was.
"There is currently a debate underway in national security circles about whether to amend NSPM-13 to restrict the autonomy of the Department of Defense, and by extension Cyber Command. " – May 5, 2022 – Hudson Institute
Recently on “The Five 8” LB and Greg discussed EO13848 and they didn’t realise it was written intentionally with a coup in mind, they just thought it was a regular boilerplate document that nearly got exploited.
Thanks for clearing this up, it was obviously written with malicious intent.
Out of all the liberal/legal commentators I listen to, Alison Gill is the only one who understands EO13848 like you guys.
Damn. I missed this plus the chat for subscribers on Thursday. I think living in PA and the time difference is a reason why.
Damn, it’s really frustrating when it doesn’t work!!! You might need to make the video start a bit later, when Gal answers the question about whether it was intentional or not-- or when you fix the issue at minute 12 or something. I’m sorry -I was just too tired--, I’m watching now, I was told it’s good stuff.
Queen & David Bowie - Under Pressure (Classic Queen Mix)
319,556,824 views Mar 19, 2013
That's a lot of people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYYRH4apXDo
Billy Idol - Eyes Without A Face (Official Music Video) Eyes Without A Face (Official Music Video) over 200 million views since 2009. That's a good one too.
Sorry I do not do Youtube chitchat so I asked here.
Ann Vandersteel could have easily been a player in “I will tell you some secrets for no other reason than to jade my family. I am of the bloodlines.” (6/24/16)
That "environmental lawyer" would have gotten us out of Paris Agreement.
"The U.S. government deposited the notification with the Secretary General of the United Nations and officially withdrew one year later on 4 November 2020."
Hey, Bonnie, try to make it this Thursday so I can meet you too. As always thanks for your likes 🧡
This is the America First Policy Institute.
They knew they lost. That is why DOJ Clark - the "environmental lawyer" – would have been quite important at that time and through January 6. The mob serves as the second threat, a foreign threat – to any country – which was most – signed onto the Paris Agreement. So the mob was also a message to other foreign leaders (as was USAID). The activated mob was both a foreign and domestic terrorism threat. Same with the mobs in cyberspace.
That is not a typo – 4 November 2020
Why wasn't the National Security Advisor – O'Brien – on duty that day? (Reference to him being out of town in Florida which he could have gotten back quickly.) Why were the duties left to deputy? National Security Advisor should have still been in command no matter where he was.
Why does Joshua Steinman say that he wrote EO 13848?
"There is currently a debate underway in national security circles about whether to amend NSPM-13 to restrict the autonomy of the Department of Defense, and by extension Cyber Command. " – May 5, 2022 – Hudson Institute
Virtual Event | The Future of Industrial Cybersecurity – July 21, 2021 – Hudson Institute
Me & the dogs will be watching
That's 11 here!! I'll go nap listening to Shania Twain
Fantastic. 🕊