13 Comments
User's avatar
aclarebear4@gmail.com's avatar

Maga have banned gun rights for known non-Trump voters online. They have already done so to me after all my constitutional rights were violated because of my social media posts exposing Trump and Flynn. These posts did NOT include any physical threats or violence against anyone of any kind! What my family and I have been through is a nightmare, and the funniest part is we were not even a gun-owning household. My husband felt it was safest, as a large family with kids and small boys who might be curious and want to play with a gun, if we just didn't own any. Which we don't, but our 2nd amendment rights have been banned by MAGA for community safety, labeling us as possible terrorists after we refused the QAnon propaganda and were just spreading the truth against the propaganda.

Expand full comment
Karen's avatar

https://www.kalw.org/show/your-legal-rights/2020-10-20/ylr-the-constitutional-implications-of-the-2020-elections-in-the-time-of-covid-19 This is a must hear radio interview with a very angry John Eastman in 10/2020- gems like "Proud Boys are not White supremacists, they are defenders of Western Civilization". Just WOW- so much in this hour! Chereminsky refused to be on a program with him again.

Expand full comment
Karen's avatar

Brings up QAnon

Expand full comment
Carolyn Garman's avatar

I disagree about Biden. He hasn't done everything perfectly or fast enough to suit us. But he grasps the situation and it's worldwide implications. As the J6 Committee holds more hearings, the public becomes more aware of how horribly we were betrayed, and more informants are whispering to the J6 Committee and to DOJ. We have to make sure people get out and vote.

Expand full comment
MarieCastany's avatar

Their every ruling is “Fruit of the Poisonous Court”... the idea that 9 people have that much power *for life* is mind boggling. Maybe it was acceptable when “old age” meant 55 years old, but certainly not now. I was wondering why the other Justices aren’t making more noise. Maybe a strike (- because I’m French)?

Expand full comment
McLain's avatar

I am of the opinion that we are already in a civil war. And regardless of what the lunatic Right may have in mind regarding the law (they are going to break it as they see fit) I do believe there can come a time when civil disobedience of an immoral, unconstitutional "law" is justified and necessary. I believe that this is that time. The Supreme Court is a captured political entity. This is not a legitimate law.

Expand full comment
MarieCastany's avatar

One day a good thing occurs, names are named, Donald, Clark &Co. have a very bad day. The next day, SCOTUS slashes through all that hope and reminds the plebs that they are in control. “Ginni’s vengeance”: she had a card in her pink sleeve and she played it so as to spread maximum destruction. Clarence even put salt on the wound with his concurring opinion that threatens the LGBTQIA+-.

Expand full comment
MikoMoby's avatar

TY. I am curious what other people think about my question, not just Jim.

Expand full comment
MarieCastany's avatar

❤️... do you remember when trump would drop horrible stuff on Friday nights? SCOTUS did the same thing, but in the morning. “Have a bad weekend, everyone!” [evil laugh)

Expand full comment
MikoMoby's avatar

YES! I had a feeling Flynn would pull something like this, considering the J6 testimony Thursday. Some Goober was setting off fireworks last night, apparently in “celebration”. Probably Greg Locke since the money will continue to just roll in and he can brainwash even more people.

Expand full comment
MikoMoby's avatar

Do you have any theories as to why the SC made this move today? Why did Flynn, etc. push this through TODAY. Is there something that the Dems are doing right now that he sees as a threat? As in the Jan6 hearings??

Also, how many countries has Flynn been involved in “Inserting” a Government. (Just numbers or names of countries is fine). TY Jim.

Expand full comment